Resident Evil: Extinction
Directed by Russell Mulcahy
Starring Milla Jovovich, Oded Fehr, Ali Larter, Iain Glen
Rated R
This wasn’t the worst movie I’ve ever seen. Coincidentally, that honor falls to Highlander II: The Quickening (a movie I dubbed The Sickening about seventeen minutes into seeing it in theaters), which was also from RE:E director Russell Mulcahy. It is arguably the weakest of the Resident Evil trio. But, if you’re there to watch Alice (Milla Jovovich) punch, pose, and pout… you’ll leave moderately satisfied.
In this third installment of the Resident Evil saga the T-Virus, developed by the shadowy Umbrella Corporation, has spread beyond Raccoon City and infected much of the known world. A caravan of a few dozen survivors, led by Claire (Ali Larter) and Resident Evil: Apocalypse survivor Carlos Olivera (Oded Fehr), aimlessly train their way through the desert in search of food, fuel, and … I think that’s it. Like my dad used to joke, somewhere to “Eat and get Gas.” Hey, that was funny when I was ten.
At its heart Resident Evil: Extinction is half-a-dozen poorly conceived set-pieces. The action is loosely strung together by a threadbare plot, which as long as we’re being honest we can agree is pretty much unnecessary. The first forty minutes of the movie felt like watching a Special Forces strike team perpetually burst into a room full of the unknown — dark and quiet locale, crew gets startled by something, crew shoots at something, some mild gore, we lose a few crew, repeat — sure there were a few moments of grizzly enjoyment here and there, but overall we would have benefited from an ounce or two less cut-scene and a gallon more substance.
I wasn’t going to waste time attacking any flawed science, but there’s so many glaring issues that I couldn’t leave it alone.
According to my research (read: Google search/Wiki), the timeline of the movie puts us about five years since the nuclear destruction of Raccoon City. In that time we’re vividly shown through time-lapsed CGI how all of the continents of the world have turned from lush habitable acreage to lifeless barren desert. To wit, every location in the film is basically straight outta the movie Dune.
How many rational people are with me in thinking that it would take a wee bit longer for the desert to *retake* our entire globe? Heck, when our caravan of the dammed reach Las Vegas, it’s blatantly overtaken by sand. I’ve been to Vegas, and I couldn’t help but mentally dispute its state of disrepair.
Yes, in spite of my willingness to accept an imaginary T-Virus, a world full of zombie people, zombie dogs, zombie birds, etc., and even the extreme close-ups of Alice that had her looking like an angelic Final Fantasy rendering, I couldn’t get past the whole sand business.
I know how silly this comes across, but it’s something I’ve said time and time again is and I’m sticking by it: Don’t take me out of my fantasy by messing with my reality.
Seriously, don’t. We’re already in the theater. We’ve willingly slipped into our suspension of disbelief. Why the fuck would you choose to patronize us with blatantly questionable malarky? It serves nothing but to force us to ask unnecessary questions in the midst of our fantasy. So, stop doing it! How hard would it have been to make it fifty or even five hundred years later? The plot wasn’t dependent on the date in the least, so adding a zero to the passage of time would have changed nothing but its plausibility.
Anyhoo, since I love post-apocalyptic settings, watching Milla Jo kick ass, and even more than both, I freakin’ LOVE Zombies!, I was able to have some fun with it. But there is nothing about this movie which allows me to recommend that you should go spend hard-earned cash on it.
Period.
So… based on the fact that you’re upset about this desert stuff, I assume you loathed Die Hard 4.0?
@unwesen
Didn’t bother to see Die Hard 4. Is there a desert in there too?
Where the fuck was a desert in Die Hard 4?! I reviewed it here and I know for a damn fact there was no desert.
Great review mate! It was fun, that’s all I needed.
I forgot about this one right after I left the theater. This one tried so much to be like Mad Max at times.
I think you’re overlooking the fact that the T-Virus mutated to destroy plant life within a few weeks as well. Once any type of plant life is removed, it’s much more feasiable that the winds are going to be stronger. Yes, it’s a stretch, but let’s at least give them some credit.
@Darury
I wish that I did overlook it, but being a Geek of the first order, I did indeed think of that as possible cause for global hyperaridation. But 1) nowhere in the movie do they state that the T-Virus killed all plant life. Why would it? In fact, wouldn’t a virus like that turn plants into some savage undead/zomibfied flora or monster fauna instead (if it was able to affected it at all)?
And 2) in the case of all plant life dying, photosynthesis would immediately cease as well, thus stopping the creation of Oxygen and effectively killing all air breathing life on the planet in the process.
So, we’re still left with no believable cause for instant-desert. Not that the producer, writer, director, or whomever, broke a sweat about it anyway.
HarHar!
Dave3 does it again.
I seriously have worries for his Zombie-Infactuation.
Although, through his experience and knowledge, I know who I’ll need be my side during the next Apocalypse…..
What do you mean it’s not Oscar-worthy?