<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Oscar Nominations for 2007</title>
	<atom:link href="http://geeksofdoom.com/2008/01/22/oscar-nominations-for-2007/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://geeksofdoom.com/2008/01/22/oscar-nominations-for-2007/</link>
	<description>Stuff by geeks, about geeks, for geeks.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 12:45:38 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: NeverWanderer</title>
		<link>http://geeksofdoom.com/2008/01/22/oscar-nominations-for-2007/comment-page-1/#comment-133442</link>
		<dc:creator>NeverWanderer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2008 04:59:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://geeksofdoom.com/2008/01/22/oscar-nominations-for-2007/#comment-133442</guid>
		<description>What&#039;s interesting to me is that all the obvious front runners (re: every single flick nominated for Best Film) were released in the last... what... two months?  Three?

This is far from a knock against those, because I&#039;m sure they deserve the recognition... but, what about the rest of the year?  Were there really NO brilliant movies released earlier in the year?  Or was it just so long ago that nobody remembers how good they were?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What&#8217;s interesting to me is that all the obvious front runners (re: every single flick nominated for Best Film) were released in the last&#8230; what&#8230; two months?  Three?</p>
<p>This is far from a knock against those, because I&#8217;m sure they deserve the recognition&#8230; but, what about the rest of the year?  Were there really NO brilliant movies released earlier in the year?  Or was it just so long ago that nobody remembers how good they were?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mo</title>
		<link>http://geeksofdoom.com/2008/01/22/oscar-nominations-for-2007/comment-page-1/#comment-133213</link>
		<dc:creator>mo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 23:01:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://geeksofdoom.com/2008/01/22/oscar-nominations-for-2007/#comment-133213</guid>
		<description>same old same old? this year has been far from same old same old.

i can&#039;t remember a year quite as good as this in quite some time.

the only shocker i see is the role philip seymour hoffman was nominated for.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>same old same old? this year has been far from same old same old.</p>
<p>i can&#8217;t remember a year quite as good as this in quite some time.</p>
<p>the only shocker i see is the role philip seymour hoffman was nominated for.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Rub</title>
		<link>http://geeksofdoom.com/2008/01/22/oscar-nominations-for-2007/comment-page-1/#comment-133034</link>
		<dc:creator>The Rub</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 15:43:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://geeksofdoom.com/2008/01/22/oscar-nominations-for-2007/#comment-133034</guid>
		<description>Same old, same old.  I am happy with the greater percentage of these.

Now let&#039;s lick this writers strike so we can have an awards show!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Same old, same old.  I am happy with the greater percentage of these.</p>
<p>Now let&#8217;s lick this writers strike so we can have an awards show!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jerry</title>
		<link>http://geeksofdoom.com/2008/01/22/oscar-nominations-for-2007/comment-page-1/#comment-133015</link>
		<dc:creator>Jerry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 15:11:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://geeksofdoom.com/2008/01/22/oscar-nominations-for-2007/#comment-133015</guid>
		<description>SO here we go again. Lots of snubs but some nice surprises too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>SO here we go again. Lots of snubs but some nice surprises too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
