Comments on: Movie Review: 10,000 B.C.

By: Moviekiller

Moviekiller — Mon, 01 Sep 2008 01:18:02 +0000

This movie was actually not bad, if you put it up against movies like, “Plan 9 From Outer Space.”

But besides that, it’s too far off.

The English I could get past, no problem!
Even the fact that there were horse back riders, sabertooth tigers and wooley mammoths.

The part I couldn’t get past was the fact that they were building the Sphinx, which is poorly inaccurate “7000-4500 B.C.” (Read on an MSNBC site and a couple others) and Iron weapons??!
In 10,000BC?? I R O N W E A P O N S ? ? ?

WTF? Bronze, MAYBE, but IRON?
That’s way beyond stupid. They had most likely flint knives, and bone, and what not.

Not friggin IRON!

Smelting wasn’t even there!

By: Al

Al — Sun, 27 Apr 2008 21:46:20 +0000

I dint really care about historic inaccuracies, but the story was utterly shite

By: alitax

alitax — Mon, 17 Mar 2008 09:37:22 +0000

i already saw the movie, and it sucked… honestly… the way the characters were almost perfectly shaved….lol, and the girl… with the running mascara… didn;t they have waterproof stuff back in that era ;p?

sucks in every possible way

By: tvnewsmag

tvnewsmag — Fri, 14 Mar 2008 11:39:03 +0000

[...] Movie Review: 10,000 B.C. [...]

By: Jerry

Jerry — Fri, 14 Mar 2008 01:40:31 +0000

This was just beyond bad.