Comments on: Simon Pegg Confirms Triple ‘Trek’

By: Sean Westcott

Sean Westcott — Thu, 27 Mar 2008 19:32:21 +0000

Back in the late 70s or early 80s I had a comic that coved the back story at starfleet Kirk and Spock first meeting all that stuff I wish I still had it I can not evern recall what it was called I hope the new Movie is good and i will see it the first week it is out

By: Jake Lockley

Jake Lockley — Thu, 27 Mar 2008 18:31:55 +0000

Get real, it’ll suck because JJ Abrams has interesting ideas that never get past that. He may be good at coming up with a pitch but turning it into a good story should be left to someone with skill. Think I’m being too harsh? Look at his credits.

By: Heroes Reporter

Heroes Reporter — Thu, 27 Mar 2008 18:12:23 +0000

[...] Simon Pegg Confirms Triple ‘Trek’ [...]

By: v1s1g0th

v1s1g0th — Wed, 26 Mar 2008 19:31:57 +0000

Very skeptical about this, a new Kirk!?. I’ve always thought they should accidentally warp to another part of the galaxy where the Empire is and start a Star Wars vs. Star Trek war. If they can do Alien v Predator and Freddy v Jason, why not? It would at least make a shitload of money.

By: FusedFIlmBLog

FusedFIlmBLog — Wed, 26 Mar 2008 18:33:45 +0000

It is going to suck because they are not doing anything original. They are just taking the best Star Trek series and revamping it with new movie making techniques and new actors.

I like JJ Abrams and I am sure this film will be entertaining but as far as a new Trek saga I am sure we will be disappointed.

By: Jerry

Jerry — Wed, 26 Mar 2008 15:27:16 +0000

Three films? Well, let’s see how the first one is.

By: Bryan

Bryan — Wed, 26 Mar 2008 12:56:17 +0000

Certainly interesting news, but it doesn’t necessarily mean that there will be three new Trek movies in the future. I remember reading, after the first Austin Powers movie was a hit, that Mike Meyers had signed a contract to appear in 10 of those movies.

Thank god they stopped when they were ahead.