<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: DVD Review: The 40-Year-Old Virgin (Blu-ray)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://geeksofdoom.com/2008/10/31/dvd-review-the-40-year-old-virgin-blu-ray/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://geeksofdoom.com/2008/10/31/dvd-review-the-40-year-old-virgin-blu-ray/</link>
	<description>Stuff by geeks, about geeks, for geeks.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 22:26:45 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Kell</title>
		<link>http://geeksofdoom.com/2008/10/31/dvd-review-the-40-year-old-virgin-blu-ray/comment-page-1/#comment-463890</link>
		<dc:creator>Kell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Nov 2008 12:50:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://geeksofdoom.com/?p=6720#comment-463890</guid>
		<description>@WordSlinger

Completely agree - I buy movies for the movie first, not for the extras. But if I had to choose between a dvd and a blu-ray of this movie, both with the same extras, but one with better quality video and audio, i&#039;ll be going for the cheaper option, simply because dvd quality video and audio is good enough for me, especially for a comedy. I look at the price of a standard dvd, compare it to a blu-ray, and I just can&#039;t picture myself justifying the extra expense.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@WordSlinger</p>
<p>Completely agree &#8211; I buy movies for the movie first, not for the extras. But if I had to choose between a dvd and a blu-ray of this movie, both with the same extras, but one with better quality video and audio, i&#8217;ll be going for the cheaper option, simply because dvd quality video and audio is good enough for me, especially for a comedy. I look at the price of a standard dvd, compare it to a blu-ray, and I just can&#8217;t picture myself justifying the extra expense.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WordSlinger</title>
		<link>http://geeksofdoom.com/2008/10/31/dvd-review-the-40-year-old-virgin-blu-ray/comment-page-1/#comment-462802</link>
		<dc:creator>WordSlinger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Nov 2008 20:47:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://geeksofdoom.com/?p=6720#comment-462802</guid>
		<description>@kell

True, but in all fairness, I don&#039;t know anyone who buys movies just for the extra features. Blu-Ray is really just being marketed to home theater junkies with Hi-Def TVs and good sound setups, and in that aspect this disc is really good. The picture and sound quality are phenomenal, and if you have the right equipment to take advantage of that, Blu-Ray is pretty incredible. PLus, depending on who you ask, some industry analysts see Blu-Ray catching on faster than DVD did a decade ago.  Sure, it may never replace DVD the same way DVD did VHS, but it is definitely not going away anytime soon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@kell</p>
<p>True, but in all fairness, I don&#8217;t know anyone who buys movies just for the extra features. Blu-Ray is really just being marketed to home theater junkies with Hi-Def TVs and good sound setups, and in that aspect this disc is really good. The picture and sound quality are phenomenal, and if you have the right equipment to take advantage of that, Blu-Ray is pretty incredible. PLus, depending on who you ask, some industry analysts see Blu-Ray catching on faster than DVD did a decade ago.  Sure, it may never replace DVD the same way DVD did VHS, but it is definitely not going away anytime soon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jerry</title>
		<link>http://geeksofdoom.com/2008/10/31/dvd-review-the-40-year-old-virgin-blu-ray/comment-page-1/#comment-462665</link>
		<dc:creator>Jerry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Nov 2008 15:27:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://geeksofdoom.com/?p=6720#comment-462665</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t know if I need to rush to get this on blu-ray, but I do love this film a lot.
 Great review.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know if I need to rush to get this on blu-ray, but I do love this film a lot.<br />
 Great review.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kell</title>
		<link>http://geeksofdoom.com/2008/10/31/dvd-review-the-40-year-old-virgin-blu-ray/comment-page-1/#comment-462537</link>
		<dc:creator>Kell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Nov 2008 12:25:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://geeksofdoom.com/?p=6720#comment-462537</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the review but other than the resolution, it seems not entirely accurate to say that there is anything unique about the blu-ray edition or that the studio has put any additional effort into this blu-ray version. Like so many blu-ray dvds out there, they have simply taken the extras from the standard dvd &#039;unrated&#039; edition and transferred onto a blu-ray disc. With meagre offerings like this, it is no surprise that blu-ray is simply failing to gain any interest with a lot of movie fans.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the review but other than the resolution, it seems not entirely accurate to say that there is anything unique about the blu-ray edition or that the studio has put any additional effort into this blu-ray version. Like so many blu-ray dvds out there, they have simply taken the extras from the standard dvd &#8216;unrated&#8217; edition and transferred onto a blu-ray disc. With meagre offerings like this, it is no surprise that blu-ray is simply failing to gain any interest with a lot of movie fans.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
