<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &#8216;Three Stooges&#8217; Back On At MGM With Farrelly Brothers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://geeksofdoom.com/2008/11/04/three-stooges-back-on-at-mgm-with-farrelly-brothers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://geeksofdoom.com/2008/11/04/three-stooges-back-on-at-mgm-with-farrelly-brothers/</link>
	<description>Stuff by geeks, about geeks, for geeks.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 22:26:45 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: korollocke</title>
		<link>http://geeksofdoom.com/2008/11/04/three-stooges-back-on-at-mgm-with-farrelly-brothers/comment-page-1/#comment-469821</link>
		<dc:creator>korollocke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 02:31:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://geeksofdoom.com/?p=7286#comment-469821</guid>
		<description>Can&#039;t possibly be worse than Stooge Mainia! What a crap movie that was!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can&#8217;t possibly be worse than Stooge Mainia! What a crap movie that was!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: korollocke</title>
		<link>http://geeksofdoom.com/2008/11/04/three-stooges-back-on-at-mgm-with-farrelly-brothers/comment-page-1/#comment-469817</link>
		<dc:creator>korollocke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 02:29:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://geeksofdoom.com/?p=7286#comment-469817</guid>
		<description>The commish/thing was curly in the stooges tv biopic.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The commish/thing was curly in the stooges tv biopic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Siah</title>
		<link>http://geeksofdoom.com/2008/11/04/three-stooges-back-on-at-mgm-with-farrelly-brothers/comment-page-1/#comment-467924</link>
		<dc:creator>Siah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2008 00:25:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://geeksofdoom.com/?p=7286#comment-467924</guid>
		<description>i think part of what made those old movies so great (along with Abbott &amp; Costello) was the fact that they were made with vintage equipment, to capture that aesthetic / theatric quality will be quite a task.. unless they just plan on levelling it up to 2K standards, which in that case would lead to the question, why even re-do it? focus those resources on something new..
It could work, but I think its better left alone, unless its a bio of some sort.. a la Robert Downey&#039;s Chaplin.. 
PS - i recently saw a pretty cool retro flic - Leatherheads, set in the 20s.. a good rent.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i think part of what made those old movies so great (along with Abbott &amp; Costello) was the fact that they were made with vintage equipment, to capture that aesthetic / theatric quality will be quite a task.. unless they just plan on levelling it up to 2K standards, which in that case would lead to the question, why even re-do it? focus those resources on something new..<br />
It could work, but I think its better left alone, unless its a bio of some sort.. a la Robert Downey&#8217;s Chaplin..<br />
PS &#8211; i recently saw a pretty cool retro flic &#8211; Leatherheads, set in the 20s.. a good rent.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
