<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: star trek new enterprise</title>
	<atom:link href="http://geeksofdoom.com/2008/11/11/the-star-trek-uss-enterprise-revealed/2008-11-11-enterprise/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://geeksofdoom.com/2008/11/11/the-star-trek-uss-enterprise-revealed/2008-11-11-enterprise/</link>
	<description>Stuff by geeks, about geeks, for geeks.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 03:39:10 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Vieux Normand</title>
		<link>http://geeksofdoom.com/2008/11/11/the-star-trek-uss-enterprise-revealed/2008-11-11-enterprise/comment-page-1/#comment-532610</link>
		<dc:creator>Vieux Normand</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2008 21:30:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://geeksofdoom.com/GoD/img/2008/11/2008-11-11-enterprise.jpg#comment-532610</guid>
		<description>Reaction 1: Oh, look! A &quot;li&#039;l cuties&quot; version of the Enterprise--complete with huge head over little tiny body! Sugoi kawaii! 

Reaction 2: &quot;On board the good ship Pez-Dispenser...&quot;

Reaction 3: There are two buttons on top: the &quot;water-saver&quot; option for when you did a number one, and the &quot;full-flush&quot; when that big ol&#039; number-two really needs to disappear.

Reaction 4: Gabe Koerner, they should&#039;ve gone with yours.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Reaction 1: Oh, look! A &#8220;li&#8217;l cuties&#8221; version of the Enterprise&#8211;complete with huge head over little tiny body! Sugoi kawaii! </p>
<p>Reaction 2: &#8220;On board the good ship Pez-Dispenser&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>Reaction 3: There are two buttons on top: the &#8220;water-saver&#8221; option for when you did a number one, and the &#8220;full-flush&#8221; when that big ol&#8217; number-two really needs to disappear.</p>
<p>Reaction 4: Gabe Koerner, they should&#8217;ve gone with yours.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: paul</title>
		<link>http://geeksofdoom.com/2008/11/11/the-star-trek-uss-enterprise-revealed/2008-11-11-enterprise/comment-page-1/#comment-499918</link>
		<dc:creator>paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 03:55:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://geeksofdoom.com/GoD/img/2008/11/2008-11-11-enterprise.jpg#comment-499918</guid>
		<description>The primary hull and connecting dorsal are fine, but the secondary hull and warp nacelles are off. There are some good basic lines but they&#039;re out of correct proportion, don&#039;t fit together right and won&#039;t &quot;shred&quot; (look both real and cool) when the ship flies. 

AND, another point...from what I&#039;ve seen the other ship, the USS Kelvin, looks cooler than the Enterprise. Not sure I like where the story and characters are headed either. This may be b/c Abrams, by his own admission, isn&#039;t a fan. And I&#039;m not just saying this b/c I&#039;m an older fan (over 40) and don&#039;t like change. I have no problem with Trek being reimagined...but you have to be true to what makes the story great or what&#039;s the point?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The primary hull and connecting dorsal are fine, but the secondary hull and warp nacelles are off. There are some good basic lines but they&#8217;re out of correct proportion, don&#8217;t fit together right and won&#8217;t &#8220;shred&#8221; (look both real and cool) when the ship flies. </p>
<p>AND, another point&#8230;from what I&#8217;ve seen the other ship, the USS Kelvin, looks cooler than the Enterprise. Not sure I like where the story and characters are headed either. This may be b/c Abrams, by his own admission, isn&#8217;t a fan. And I&#8217;m not just saying this b/c I&#8217;m an older fan (over 40) and don&#8217;t like change. I have no problem with Trek being reimagined&#8230;but you have to be true to what makes the story great or what&#8217;s the point?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: necrophantomasphixiation</title>
		<link>http://geeksofdoom.com/2008/11/11/the-star-trek-uss-enterprise-revealed/2008-11-11-enterprise/comment-page-1/#comment-491622</link>
		<dc:creator>necrophantomasphixiation</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Nov 2008 13:25:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://geeksofdoom.com/GoD/img/2008/11/2008-11-11-enterprise.jpg#comment-491622</guid>
		<description>BRAVO</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BRAVO</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hojimoto</title>
		<link>http://geeksofdoom.com/2008/11/11/the-star-trek-uss-enterprise-revealed/2008-11-11-enterprise/comment-page-1/#comment-489848</link>
		<dc:creator>Hojimoto</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Nov 2008 16:17:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://geeksofdoom.com/GoD/img/2008/11/2008-11-11-enterprise.jpg#comment-489848</guid>
		<description>Mmm. Yummeh. I likey. Nacelles are a bit... bulbous but otherwise that&#039;s the Enterprise I know and love.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mmm. Yummeh. I likey. Nacelles are a bit&#8230; bulbous but otherwise that&#8217;s the Enterprise I know and love.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
