Comments on: Shia LaBeouf Says Steven Spielberg Has The ‘Indiana Jones 5′ Story Set

By: Dave

Dave — Sat, 15 Aug 2009 17:05:47 +0000

There’s nothing wrong with Crystal Skull. It’s a far more entertaining movie than Temple of Doom. Sure a little to much cgi in this last installment, but still has the old feeling of the earlier films.
Harrison Ford IS Indianna Jones. He brings humor and humanity with his performance that is second to none. Not many new actors of his caliber.
Many should do themselves a favor and re-watch this movie.

By: Steve

Steve — Thu, 18 Jun 2009 15:03:06 +0000

I hate to say it, but if they were to do new movies, start by recasting Indy and stick to the Pulp timeline of the 30’s. And keep the Nazis and classic villains. I’d miss Ford, but I don’t want to see another geriatric Indy movie. And I sure as hell don’t want to see Shia.

The 1950’s suck and Commies are no fun.

By: Ttandc

Ttandc — Thu, 18 Jun 2009 05:27:24 +0000

I have to watch it again I think but I didn’t consider it a bad movie. If I was to hold it up to other movies that have come out over the last few years, I’d say it is not anywhere near the worst movie. If I was to compare it with the other indie movies well that’s a bit tough. When most people in my age brackets ( 25-35 ) watched their first indie movie it was when we were kids, when our imaginations were at their highest and everything was new and fascinating. Those movies showed us peoples and places we had never seen before. It’s hard to reproduce that feeling 20 or more years later when we have now seen almost all the people and places. But that’s just my 2 cents :)

By: mo

mo — Wed, 17 Jun 2009 16:16:20 +0000

you shouldn’t listen to baristas, unless it’s about coffee.

the first 10-15 minutes of that movie have to be the worst dialogue i’ve ever heard in a film, nearly as bad as the happening.

just uncomfortable.

By: Slipstream

Slipstream — Wed, 17 Jun 2009 05:29:18 +0000

A barista at a local coffee shop convinced me I need to grab the dvd of Crystal Skull and watch the special introduction/commentary with Spielberg and Lucas and watch it again with new eyes. He says hearing why they made certain decisions for the style of film (besides the awful CGI overuse), there was a reason for why it had a pulp lens on. Once this guy watched it again with that, he said he enjoyed it for what it was. I’m gonna try checking it out once again, but that doesn’t excuse the fact they alienated so many fans of the originals. I actually think Staff of Kings (see every game console) looks like it would of been a much better story/script altogether.