Comments on: Good News Everyone: Hugh Jackman NOT Hosting The Oscars; Who’s Next?

By: Joseph

Joseph — Wed, 04 Nov 2009 03:26:44 +0000

Official: Steve Martin and Alec Baldwin are co-hosting the Oscars. That could be a funny combo right there. Sure, Steve Martin hasn’t been funny since 1756 but the two together might be comedy gold. I am looking forward to it.

By: Tori

Tori — Mon, 02 Nov 2009 20:28:29 +0000

I would love to see James Franco host the Oscars!=D <3
And whoever Cactina if you don’t have anything nice to say please keep it to yourself. Thanks.

By: tarsonus

tarsonus — Mon, 02 Nov 2009 15:30:43 +0000

NP fucking H. best idea they could have ever thought of. A guy who is a skilled stage performer, an awesome actor, not afraid to make fun of himself…total win if he hosts, and the first ceremony i will have watched in forever.

By: Gene Marie

Gene Marie — Sun, 01 Nov 2009 19:41:58 +0000

I’m a fan of Hugh Jackman on the Oscars. But I also think great things can become tiresome and lose that greatness. I think change is good, Franco’s talented, we’ll see how he does on the Oscars. I have little doubt.

By: Kinga

Kinga — Sun, 01 Nov 2009 15:02:50 +0000

Definitely James Franco

By: cactina

cactina — Sun, 01 Nov 2009 00:01:48 +0000

Anyone but James Franco. I am getting a little tired of his ubiquitousness.

By: theana

theana — Sat, 31 Oct 2009 18:51:12 +0000

Although he did a great job last year I would not have expected him to hos it again this year. I believe that James Franco should be this years host.He has an amazing presence that which would make it an incredible show.

By: Ezra

Ezra — Sat, 31 Oct 2009 13:32:41 +0000

It´s bad news, not good news. But I understand his decision, it´s pretty wise, actually. But still, I am sorry and I am not sure I am going to watch it this time if they should track back to 7-minutes long monologue…

By: Kell

Kell — Sat, 31 Oct 2009 10:36:30 +0000

I agree that is good news, because one appearance was enough to boost Hugh’s cred, but two would have started to undermine it. He did a great job with song and dance, especially since it looked and felt like they really cut back on the money. But doing the oscars really creates a pigeon hole for the presenter’s career options.

By: Joseph

Joseph — Sat, 31 Oct 2009 04:39:48 +0000

The answer is Craig Ferguson (and glad to see Wolverine gone).

By: chris

chris — Sat, 31 Oct 2009 00:12:08 +0000

Bad News Everyone: Hugh Jackman NOT Hosting The Oscars. I need to say no more…