<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Geeks of Doom &#187; Dr. Geek, Ph.D.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://geeksofdoom.com/author/drgeek/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://geeksofdoom.com</link>
	<description>Stuff by geeks, about geeks, for geeks.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 19:00:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>To Boldly Go On: A Long-Time Fan Re-Examines His Love Of &#8216;Star Trek&#8217;</title>
		<link>http://geeksofdoom.com/2009/05/06/to-boldly-go-on-a-long-time-fan-re-examines-his-love-of-star-trek/</link>
		<comments>http://geeksofdoom.com/2009/05/06/to-boldly-go-on-a-long-time-fan-re-examines-his-love-of-star-trek/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 02:53:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dr. Geek, Ph.D.</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Features]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Week of Geek]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gene Roddenberry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[JJ Abrams]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Leonard Nimoy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Star Trek]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[William Shatner]]></category>
<category>Gene Roddenberry</category><category>JJ Abrams</category><category>Leonard Nimoy</category><category>Star Trek</category><category>William Shatner</category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://geeksofdoom.com/?p=20045</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As the <strong><em>Star Trek</em></strong> franchise is about to get a much-needed re-boot later this week, I've been thinking a lot about the series and the role its played in my life. Being born during the run of The Original Series, I represent what I suppose could be called the "second generation" of Trekkies (there was no stigma associated with that term 30 years ago.)  I got acquainted with <em>Star Trek</em> through endless re-runs on syndicated TV in the 1970s, <strong><em>The Animated Series</em></strong> on Saturday mornings, and <strong><em>Star Trek: The Motion Picture</em></strong>.   Once I was hooked, love of <em>Trek</em> stayed with me for a solid 25 years -- as I have <a target="_blank" href="http://geeksofdoom.com/2006/09/07/the-star-trek-years/">previously discussed</a>.  There have been many changes during all that time, from movie to movie, series to series, and cast to cast.   I've weathered nearly all of them, but I find myself wondering if I am ready to fall in love again.
<br /><br />
Part of this has to do with the "origin" concept of <strong>J.J. Abrams</strong>' new film.   I've never felt that an origin story for The Original Series crew has ever been particularly necessary.   I can look at the first scene where <strong>William Shatner</strong> and <strong>Leonard Nimoy</strong> appear together in "Where No Man Has Gone Before," and that holds up as well as their last scene together in <strong><em>The Undiscovered Country</em></strong>, twenty five years later.  That's an amazing thing to my mind, and a testament to the writing skills of <strong>Samuel Peeples</strong> and the production skills of <strong>Gene Roddenberry</strong>. Since <em>Star Trek</em> appeared nearly fully formed right at the beginning, why mess with that? [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://geeksofdoom.com/2009/05/06/to-boldly-go-on-a-long-time-fan-re-examines-his-love-of-star-trek/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>DVD Review: The Day The Earth Stood Still (Blu-ray)</title>
		<link>http://geeksofdoom.com/2009/04/27/dvd-review-the-day-the-earth-stood-still-blu-ray/</link>
		<comments>http://geeksofdoom.com/2009/04/27/dvd-review-the-day-the-earth-stood-still-blu-ray/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 00:37:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dr. Geek, Ph.D.</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[DVD Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DVDs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jaden Smith]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jennifer Connelly]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Cleese]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kathy Bates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Keanu Reeves]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scott Derrickson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Day The Earth Stood Still]]></category>
<category>Jaden Smith</category><category>Jennifer Connelly</category><category>John Cleese</category><category>Kathy Bates</category><category>Keanu Reeves</category><category>Scott Derrickson</category><category>The Day The Earth Stood Still</category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://geeksofdoom.com/?p=19238</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<strong><a target="_blank" href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B001SMC9IK?ie=UTF8&#038;tag=geeksofdoom-20&#038;linkCode=as2&#038;camp=1789&#038;creative=9325&#038;creativeASIN=B001SMC9IK"><em>The Day the Earth Stood Still</em></a><img src="http://www.assoc-amazon.com/e/ir?t=geeksofdoom-20&#038;l=as2&#038;o=1&#038;a=B001SMC9IK" width="1" height="1" border="0" alt="" style="border:none !important; margin:0px !important;" /><br />
3-Disc Special Edition Blu-ray<br />
Directed by Scott Derrickson<br />
Starring Keanu Reeves, Jennifer Connelly, Kathy Bates, Jaden Smith, John Cleese<br />
Fox Home Entertainment<br />
Release date: April 7, 2009</strong>
<br /><br />
Of all the science fiction films made in the 1950s, I have three favorites:  <em>Them!</em>, <em>Forbidden Planet</em>, and <em>The Day The Earth Stood Still</em>. Each was seminal in its way, showing the movie-going public more of what the genre was capable.  <em>Forbidden Planet</em> had astounding special effects, an all-electronic score, and a plot taken from Shakespeare.  <em>Them!</em> carried both an ecological message and provided genuine suspense.  <em>The Day The Earth Stood Still</em> was a brave message film, dealing with anti-Communist paranoia and questions of nuclear disarmament.  Without these films, there would have been no <em>Star Trek</em>, no <em>Star Wars</em>, no <em>Alien</em>. 
<br /><br />
I therefore viewed the 2008 re-make of <strong><em>The Day The Earth Stood Still</em></strong> with some... hesitation.  True, the film has a fine cast in <strong>Keanu Reeves</strong>, <strong>Jennifer Connelly</strong>, and <strong>Kathy Bates</strong>.   With all the problems that have moved to the forefront of our minds in the last 10 years (terrorism, global warming, and warrant-less wire tapping), there is also a lot fertile ground for an update.   Yet, this is Hollywood we're talking about.  The summer tent pole movie is much more about effects than plot and commentary.   I think that Hollywood can blend both types of elements very effectively (see: <em>The Dark Knight</em>), but those movies are rare... just like the original version of <em>The Day The Earth Stood Still</em> was a rare film in its day [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://geeksofdoom.com/2009/04/27/dvd-review-the-day-the-earth-stood-still-blu-ray/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Book Review: Zombie CSU: The Forensics of the Living Dead</title>
		<link>http://geeksofdoom.com/2009/02/11/book-review-zombie-csu-the-forensics-of-the-living-dead/</link>
		<comments>http://geeksofdoom.com/2009/02/11/book-review-zombie-csu-the-forensics-of-the-living-dead/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2009 13:22:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dr. Geek, Ph.D.</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Book Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zombie Round-Up]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Citadel Press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jonathan Maberry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zombie CSU]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zombies]]></category>
<category>Citadel Press</category><category>Jonathan Maberry</category><category>Zombie CSU</category><category>Zombies</category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://geeksofdoom.com/?p=14189</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<strong><em>Zombie CSU: The Forensics of the Living Dead</em>
<a target="_blank href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/080652877X?ie=UTF8&#038;tag=geeksofdoom-20&#038;linkCode=as2&#038;camp=1789&#038;creative=390957&#038;creativeASIN=080652877X">Paperback</a><img src="http://www.assoc-amazon.com/e/ir?t=geeksofdoom-20&#038;l=as2&#038;o=1&#038;a=080652877X" width="1" height="1" border="0" alt="" style="border:none !important; margin:0px !important;" /><br />
Written by Jonathan Maberry<br />
Citadel Press<br />
Release date: September 1, 2008</strong><br />
<br />
It's a good time to be a zombie, or at least a lover of all things zombie-related.   Max Brooks recently had two best sellers about the undead hordes, <em>The Zombie Survival Guide</em> (a sort of "worst case scenario" book for dealing with the ghoulish undead) and <em>World War Z</em> (an oral history of the coming war against the zombie hordes.)  <em>Call To Duty: World At War</em> had a special game play mode after the credits rolled, where suddenly you have to fight your way through hordes of carnivorous Nazi undead in order to extend your miserable life.   Zombies from the Third Reich also appear in <em>Dead Snow</em>, a selection at the 2009 Sundance Film Festival in which a group of Scandinavian kids who accidentally awaken Wehrmacht and SS zombie hordes in the Nordic snow.   We will even soon be treated to <em>Pride and Prejudice and Zombies</em>, a classic Regency zombie romance re-write of a Jane Austen classic by Seth Grahame-Smith.
<br /><br />
To all this zombie gold, we must add <strong><em>Zombie CSU - The Forensics of the Living Dead</em></strong> by<strong> Jonathan Maberry</strong>. Taking something of an opposite tack from Max Brooks' work, Maberry starts by asking "What would a real zombie outbreak look like?" and then goes to find answers from real pathologists and criminologists who are interested in the subject.  Along the way, he provides frequent little detours into zombie-related subjects like the roots of the modern zombie phenomenon, lists of key zombie films, differences between zombie film genres, the zombie in art and illustration, and quotes from fellow zombie-philes in the arts and sciences [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://geeksofdoom.com/2009/02/11/book-review-zombie-csu-the-forensics-of-the-living-dead/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Gadget Review: The &#8216;Executive Series Fusion&#8217; by Wicked Lasers</title>
		<link>http://geeksofdoom.com/2008/11/26/gadget-review-the-executive-series-fusion-by-wicked-lasers/</link>
		<comments>http://geeksofdoom.com/2008/11/26/gadget-review-the-executive-series-fusion-by-wicked-lasers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 17:54:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dr. Geek, Ph.D.</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Gadgets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tech Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Laser Pointers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lasers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[phasers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Physics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Star Trek]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wicked Laser]]></category>
<category>Gadgets</category><category>Laser Pointers</category><category>Lasers</category><category>Phasers</category><category>Physics</category><category>Star Trek</category><category>Wicked Laser</category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://geeksofdoom.com/?p=8905</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ever wonder what it might be like to have a <em>Star Trek</em> phaser of your very own?   I have.  Ever since I saw Kirk and Spock fire at a rock, a Horta, or a crazed crewman, I've been intrigued with the possibilities of coherent light.  This led to early perusal of <a target="_blank" href="http://www.alibris.com/booksearch?qwork=7141804&#038;matches=39&#038;wquery=the+way+things+work&#038;cm_sp=works*listing*title">The Way Things Work: An Illustrated Encyclopedia of Technology</a> for the explanation of how lasers worked and time spent pouring over ads in <a target="_blank" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Edmund_Scientific_Corporation">Edmund Scientific</a> catalogs for real lasers.  Eventually, I got to do some experiments with lasers in my college physics classes, but I was still not completely satisfied.
<br /><br />
Though the <em>Executive Series Fusion</em> has the size, dull matte finish, and heft of a high quality laser pointer, it means serious business.  Meant for the optics enthusiast, it is bright -- insanely bright.  You can see the beam in darkened rooms.  You can also damage objects.  You can make holes in dark-colored balloons and dark trash bags and cut black electrical tape.  The <a target="_blank" href="http://www.wickedlasers.com">Wicked Lasers</a> web site even says it will light wood or paper matches [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://geeksofdoom.com/2008/11/26/gadget-review-the-executive-series-fusion-by-wicked-lasers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The &#8216;Star Trek&#8217; USS Enterprise: First Impressions</title>
		<link>http://geeksofdoom.com/2008/11/14/the-%e2%80%98star-trek%e2%80%99-uss-enterprise-first-impressions/</link>
		<comments>http://geeksofdoom.com/2008/11/14/the-%e2%80%98star-trek%e2%80%99-uss-enterprise-first-impressions/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 14:41:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dr. Geek, Ph.D.</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Features]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[JJ Abrams]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Star Trek IX]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Star Trek TOS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Star Trek: The Next Generation]]></category>
<category>JJ Abrams</category><category>Star Trek</category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://geeksofdoom.com/?p=8148</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Earlier this week, Geeks of Doom <a href="http://geeksofdoom.com/2008/11/11/the-star-trek-uss-enterprise-revealed/" target="_blank">reported</a> that about the first full look at the USS Enterprise from <strong>JJ Abrams</strong>' upcoming movie <strong><em>Star Trek</em></strong>.  
<br /><br />
Few images are so immediately identified with the heart and soul of the <em>Star Trek</em> franchise. Few images have also changed so little over the intervening years; there was one major design for <em>Star Trek: TOS</em> (which changed slightly over the course of the series) and another design introduced in <em>Star Trek: The Motion Picture</em> in 1978 that lasted almost unchanged until <em>Star Trek VI: The Undiscovered Country</em> in 1991.  
<br /><br />
Mr. Abrams is delivering the first major change in Enterprise design in 30 years, and the first not approved by <em>Trek</em> creator Gene Roddenberry himself.  He had to know that anything he and his creative team changed in the profile of the USS Enterprise would be controversial. This is why we are seeing it now, not when the movie comes out -- so the <em>Star Trek </em> fan base can talk all this through and figure out if we really like it [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://geeksofdoom.com/2008/11/14/the-%e2%80%98star-trek%e2%80%99-uss-enterprise-first-impressions/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Top 5 Casting Decisions That Could Kill An &#8216;Iron Man&#8217; Sequel</title>
		<link>http://geeksofdoom.com/2008/11/10/the-top-five-casting-decisions-that-could-kill-an-iron-man-movie-sequel/</link>
		<comments>http://geeksofdoom.com/2008/11/10/the-top-five-casting-decisions-that-could-kill-an-iron-man-movie-sequel/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2008 17:51:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dr. Geek, Ph.D.</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David Hasselhoff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Don Cheadle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eddie Murphy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gwyneth Paltrow]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iron Man]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iron Man 2]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jeff Bridges]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Robert Downey Jr]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sharon Stone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Terrence Howard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tom Cruise]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[William Shatner]]></category>
<category>David Hasselhoff</category><category>Don Cheadle</category><category>Eddie Murphy</category><category>Gwyneth Paltrow</category><category>Iron Man</category><category>Iron Man 2</category><category>Jeff Bridges</category><category>Robert Downey Jr</category><category>Sharon Stone</category><category>Terrence Howard</category><category>Tom Cruise</category><category>William Shatner</category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://geeksofdoom.com/?p=6705</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<strong><em>Iron Man</em></strong> was a great movie.  With an unusual amount of humor and sarcastic wit, the movie took on the usually tough assignment of telling the superhero origin myth and as a result became a summer favorite with audiences.  It also was a financial powerhouse, earning nearly $320 million in U.S. domestic receipts by the end of September. <br /> <br />

With such success, a sequel is inevitable.  Hollywood being Hollywood, someone will always suggest a way to "improve" a monster hit.  Take the much-publicized decision to replace Terrence Howard with Don Cheadle in the sequel.  While I do not think that Mr. Howard was the strongest link in the first movie, that opinion has much more to do with the fact that the character of James "Rhodey" Rhodes was a minor, supporting character in this version of the origin myth, and not any reflection on Mr. Howard's acting chops.  Yet, I'm sure that someone in Hollywood felt that Mr. Cheadle will add something more to Rhodey either being Iron Man or War Machine in the next film. People say "don't mess with a winning formula," but they've never heard that rule in Hollywood (or never listened, if they did.) <br /> <br />

<strong>So, it is in the spirit of messing with a winning formula that I offer some further boneheaded casting changes and the rational behind them that could be proposed by some mid-level Hollywood creative type hoping to make a mark on Tinsel Town ...</strong>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://geeksofdoom.com/2008/11/10/the-top-five-casting-decisions-that-could-kill-an-iron-man-movie-sequel/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Comic Review Exclusive: Jesus Hates Zombies: Yea, Though I Walk, Vol. 1</title>
		<link>http://geeksofdoom.com/2008/08/06/comic-review-exclusive-jesus-hates-zombies-yea-though-i-walk-vol-1/</link>
		<comments>http://geeksofdoom.com/2008/08/06/comic-review-exclusive-jesus-hates-zombies-yea-though-i-walk-vol-1/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2008 00:06:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dr. Geek, Ph.D.</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Comic Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Comics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alterna Comics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jesus Hates Zombies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lauren Monardo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephen Lindsay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Steve Cobb]]></category>
<category>Alterna Comics</category><category>Jesus Hates Zombies</category><category>Lauren Monardo</category><category>Stephen Lindsay</category><category>Steve Cobb</category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://geeksofdoom.com/2008/08/06/comic-review-exclusive-jesus-hates-zombies-yea-though-i-walk-vol-1/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I first encountered <strong><em>Jesus Hates Zombies</em></strong> nearly a year ago, when I was asked to review the original <strong><em>Jesus Hates Zombies... and Sasquatch</em></strong> for the final chapter of <a targt="_blank" href="http://geeksofdoom.com/2007/09/15/the-great-zombie-round-up-the-final-chapter/">The Great Zombie Roundup</a>.  Looking back at what I wrote then, I see that I struggled with the concept.  I thought that the story idea had merit, and that some of the dialog showed great ironic edge (Jesus: “Ever ask yourself ‘how the hell did I get here?’”).  With benefit of hindsight, I see that it was too brief of a story to know if <em>Jesus Hates Zombies</em> could fulfill its potential...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://geeksofdoom.com/2008/08/06/comic-review-exclusive-jesus-hates-zombies-yea-though-i-walk-vol-1/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Five Questions Not Answered In &#8216;Indiana Jones And The Kingdom Of The Crystal Skull&#8217;</title>
		<link>http://geeksofdoom.com/2008/06/03/five-questions-not-answered-by-indiana-jones-and-the-kingdom-of-the-crystal-skull/</link>
		<comments>http://geeksofdoom.com/2008/06/03/five-questions-not-answered-by-indiana-jones-and-the-kingdom-of-the-crystal-skull/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jun 2008 17:38:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dr. Geek, Ph.D.</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Fanatic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Features]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Week of Geek]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George Lucas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Harrison Ford]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Indiana Jones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[questions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spoilers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Steven Spielberg]]></category>
<category>Indiana Jones</category><category>Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull</category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://geeksofdoom.com/2008/06/03/five-questions-not-answered-by-indiana-jones-and-the-kingdom-of-the-crystal-skull/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Given the time in development and the abundance of top-notch screenwriting talent, it is surprising that the screenplay of <em>Indiana Jones And The Kingdom Of The Crystal Skull</em> is a bit of a mess. The movie left me asking questions about how or why certain things happened. After 18 years and several screen writers, shouldn't all these questions be answered? Here's a look at the top five unanswered questions from the film. ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://geeksofdoom.com/2008/06/03/five-questions-not-answered-by-indiana-jones-and-the-kingdom-of-the-crystal-skull/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>63</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>DVD Review: The Muppet Show S3</title>
		<link>http://geeksofdoom.com/2008/05/28/dvd-review-the-muppet-show-the-complete-third-season/</link>
		<comments>http://geeksofdoom.com/2008/05/28/dvd-review-the-muppet-show-the-complete-third-season/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2008 15:39:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dr. Geek, Ph.D.</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[DVD Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DVDs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
<category>dvd reviews</category><category>muppets</category><category>sesame street</category><category>the muppet show</category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://geeksofdoom.com/2008/05/28/dvd-review-the-muppet-show-the-complete-third-season/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This 4-disc DVD contains all 24 episodes of the third season of the popular 1970's Jim Henson television variety program, <em>The Muppet Show</em>.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://geeksofdoom.com/2008/05/28/dvd-review-the-muppet-show-the-complete-third-season/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A Visit To Maker Faire Bay Area 2008</title>
		<link>http://geeksofdoom.com/2008/05/07/a-visit-to-maker-faire-bay-area-2008/</link>
		<comments>http://geeksofdoom.com/2008/05/07/a-visit-to-maker-faire-bay-area-2008/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 02:26:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dr. Geek, Ph.D.</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Conventions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DIY]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Features]]></category>
<category>Astronomy</category><category>education</category><category>Gadgets</category><category>hardware</category><category>Lego</category><category>Linux</category><category>Make Magazine</category><category>Maker Faire</category><category>Photography</category><category>robots</category><category>Science</category><category>Star Wars</category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://geeksofdoom.com/2008/05/07/a-visit-to-maker-faire-bay-area-2008/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The United States is a nation of tinkerers.  We build, we modify, and we extend.  We like to make devices do things that they are not designed to do, just to know that we've done it. This spirit was alive and well over the weekend at the San Mateo County Expo at the <a target="_blank" href="http://www.makerfaire.com">Maker Faire Bay Area</a>. The Maker Faire was an absolute blast.  I heartily recommend it to geeks of all kinds.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://geeksofdoom.com/2008/05/07/a-visit-to-maker-faire-bay-area-2008/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>DVD Review: &#8216;Doctor Who: The Time Warrior&#8217;</title>
		<link>http://geeksofdoom.com/2008/04/25/dvd-review-doctor-who-the-time-warrior/</link>
		<comments>http://geeksofdoom.com/2008/04/25/dvd-review-doctor-who-the-time-warrior/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 16:45:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dr. Geek, Ph.D.</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[DVD Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DVDs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
<category>Barry Letts</category><category>BBC</category><category>Doctor Who</category><category>Elisabeth Sladen</category><category>Jon Pertwee</category><category>Terrance Dicks</category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://geeksofdoom.com/2008/04/25/dvd-review-doctor-who-the-time-warrior/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This four-episode collection featuring Jon Pertwee as The Doctor makes it an interesting point in the history of the series, with its introduction of the Sarah Jane character. ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://geeksofdoom.com/2008/04/25/dvd-review-doctor-who-the-time-warrior/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>DVD Review: The Last Legion</title>
		<link>http://geeksofdoom.com/2007/12/18/dvd-review-the-last-legion/</link>
		<comments>http://geeksofdoom.com/2007/12/18/dvd-review-the-last-legion/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 15:09:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dr. Geek, Ph.D.</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[DVD Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DVDs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>
<category>Aishwarya Rai</category><category>Ben Kingsley</category><category>Colin Firth</category><category>Doug Lefler</category><category>The Last Legion</category><category>Thomas Sangster</category><category>Weinstein Company</category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://geeksofdoom.com/2007/12/18/dvd-review-the-last-legion/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Colin Firth and Ben Kingsley star in this action fantasy film, which links of the Fall of the Roman Empire with the roots of Arthurian legend.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://geeksofdoom.com/2007/12/18/dvd-review-the-last-legion/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tech Review: AirDrives Interactive Stereo Headphones</title>
		<link>http://geeksofdoom.com/2007/12/02/gadget-review-airdrives-interactive-stereo-headphones/</link>
		<comments>http://geeksofdoom.com/2007/12/02/gadget-review-airdrives-interactive-stereo-headphones/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Dec 2007 16:40:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dr. Geek, Ph.D.</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Gadgets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tech Reviews]]></category>
<category>airdrives</category><category>hardware</category><category>headphones</category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://geeksofdoom.com/2007/12/02/gadget-review-airdrives-interactive-stereo-headphones/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The "look" of headphones has changed radically over the last 30 years, but the actual mechanics of turning an electrical signal into sound in your ear has remained largely unchanged... until now.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://geeksofdoom.com/2007/12/02/gadget-review-airdrives-interactive-stereo-headphones/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>DVD Review: Las Vegas Season 4</title>
		<link>http://geeksofdoom.com/2007/10/27/dvd-review-las-vegas-season-4/</link>
		<comments>http://geeksofdoom.com/2007/10/27/dvd-review-las-vegas-season-4/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Oct 2007 18:44:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dr. Geek, Ph.D.</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[DVD Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DVDs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
<category>James Caan</category><category>Jerry OConnell</category><category>Jill Hennessey</category><category>Josh Duhamel</category><category>Lara Flynn Boyle</category><category>Las Vegas</category><category>Nikki Cox</category><category>Vanessa Marcil</category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://geeksofdoom.com/2007/10/27/dvd-review-las-vegas-season-4/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The fourth season of the NBC drama is a mix of guilty pleasure, attractive cast members, outrageous guest performances, and over-the-top plot lines. ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://geeksofdoom.com/2007/10/27/dvd-review-las-vegas-season-4/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Movie Review: Highlander: The Source</title>
		<link>http://geeksofdoom.com/2007/09/20/movie-review-highlander-the-source/</link>
		<comments>http://geeksofdoom.com/2007/09/20/movie-review-highlander-the-source/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Sep 2007 00:30:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dr. Geek, Ph.D.</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Movie Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
<category>Adrian Paul</category><category>Highlander</category><category>Jim Byrnes</category><category>Peter Wingfield</category><category>Stephen Wight</category><category>Thekla Reuten</category><category>Thom Fell</category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://geeksofdoom.com/2007/09/20/movie-review-highlander-the-source/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The <strong><em>Highlander</em></strong> franchise has a long and checkered history with creative output that has often been more bad than good.  This production record will not be improved by the latest made-for-TV movie in the franchise, <strong><em>Highlander: The Source</em></strong>.  The production disappoints.  There is only the semblance of a plot. Characters are poorly drawn.  Lack of subtlety and a real back story leaves the ending feeling empty.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://geeksofdoom.com/2007/09/20/movie-review-highlander-the-source/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Last &#8216;Dragon&#8217;</title>
		<link>http://geeksofdoom.com/2007/08/24/the-last-dragon/</link>
		<comments>http://geeksofdoom.com/2007/08/24/the-last-dragon/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Aug 2007 23:31:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dr. Geek, Ph.D.</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
<category>Dragon Magazine</category><category>Dungeons and Dragons</category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://geeksofdoom.com/2007/08/24/the-last-dragon/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After over 30 years, Dragon Magazine will print no more.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://geeksofdoom.com/2007/08/24/the-last-dragon/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>TV Review: &#8216;The Universe&#8217; &#8212; Life and Death of a Star</title>
		<link>http://geeksofdoom.com/2007/08/23/tv-review-the-universe-life-and-death-of-a-star/</link>
		<comments>http://geeksofdoom.com/2007/08/23/tv-review-the-universe-life-and-death-of-a-star/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2007 10:51:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dr. Geek, Ph.D.</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TV Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
<category>History Channel</category><category>The Universe</category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://geeksofdoom.com/2007/08/23/tv-review-the-universe-life-and-death-of-a-star/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[During this episode of The History Channel series <em>The Universe</em> we learn about the biology of stars -- how they are born, live, and die.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://geeksofdoom.com/2007/08/23/tv-review-the-universe-life-and-death-of-a-star/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Nature or Nurture: What Will Be Next For Star Trek?</title>
		<link>http://geeksofdoom.com/2007/08/20/nature-or-nurture-how-would-different-directors-do-a-star-trek-movie/</link>
		<comments>http://geeksofdoom.com/2007/08/20/nature-or-nurture-how-would-different-directors-do-a-star-trek-movie/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Aug 2007 14:48:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dr. Geek, Ph.D.</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>
<category>JJ Abrams</category><category>Paramount</category><category>Star Trek</category><category>Star Trek XI</category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://geeksofdoom.com/2007/08/20/nature-or-nurture-how-would-different-directors-do-a-star-trek-movie/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[To what degree will J.J. Abrams make <em>Star Trek</em> his own? Consider what the following producer/directors might do with the <em><strong>Star Trek</strong></em> franchise, given the chance. 
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://geeksofdoom.com/2007/08/20/nature-or-nurture-how-would-different-directors-do-a-star-trek-movie/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>16</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Movie Review: Ratatouille</title>
		<link>http://geeksofdoom.com/2007/06/23/movie-review-ratatouille/</link>
		<comments>http://geeksofdoom.com/2007/06/23/movie-review-ratatouille/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jun 2007 16:32:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dr. Geek, Ph.D.</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Animated]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movie Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>
<category>Disney</category><category>Pixar</category><category>Ratatouille</category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://geeksofdoom.com/2007/06/23/film-review-ratatouille/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<strong><em>Ratatouille</em></strong> is a (very) good film, not a great film.   There is a lot to enjoy about it.  It is both very pleasing to the eye and careful to create characters with substance and depth.   I hope that the general public will be amazed, enthralled, and entertained with it comes out on June 29th.  I did not leave the theater after <strong><em>Ratatouille</em></strong> with the same sense of magic that I felt after seeing <strong><em>The Incredibles</em></strong>, but it came close.  ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://geeksofdoom.com/2007/06/23/movie-review-ratatouille/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Movie Review: Pirates Of The Caribbean: At World&#8217;s End</title>
		<link>http://geeksofdoom.com/2007/05/29/movie-review-pirates-of-the-caribbean-at-worlds-end/</link>
		<comments>http://geeksofdoom.com/2007/05/29/movie-review-pirates-of-the-caribbean-at-worlds-end/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 May 2007 06:03:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dr. Geek, Ph.D.</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Movie Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Theme Parks]]></category>
<category>Johnny Depp</category><category>Pirates of the Caribbean</category><category>Pirates Of The Caribbean: At Worlds End</category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://geeksofdoom.com/2007/05/29/movie-review-pirates-of-the-caribbean-at-worlds-end/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<strong><em>Pirates Of The Caribbean: At World's End</em></strong> is a good (but not great) popcorn crunching piece of entertainment that represents why more is not always better when it comes to Hollywood movies.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://geeksofdoom.com/2007/05/29/movie-review-pirates-of-the-caribbean-at-worlds-end/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>17</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
