The Strangers
Directed by Bryan Bertino
Starring Liv Tyler and Scott Speedman
Rated R
Release date: May 30, 2008
Is Tamara home?
A simple and seemingly innocent question, but when James Hoyt (Scott Speedman) and Kristen McKay (Liv Tyler) are asked this by a mysterious blonde woman at their door at 4 AM, it quickly becomes obvious we’ll never know who Tamara is or if she even exists. Shortly after the stranger leaves, scary things begin to happen around their cabin, but to say more than that would give away too much and thus spoil the refreshingly scary movie The Strangers.
In many ways the movie is like so many others in the horror genre (young attractive people being stalked by masked murders and all that), but the truly scary part is how easily it could really happen and, in some cases, already has.
The story claims to be inspired by true events. Depending on who you talk to, the film’s inspiration comes from events from writer/director Bryan Bertino‘s childhood neighborhood, the Mason Family, or the Cabin 28 murders. Regardless, the story of The Strangers is vague enough to be connected to thousands of real crimes, which is what makes it so unnerving.
The Strangers centers on an idea: the idea of random inexplicable violence by normal people. No matter how scary Michael Myers, Jason, Freddy, or the other sadistic fictional killers that have terrified us on the big screen may be, they always have a victim profile that excludes most if not all of the audience. We can all go home and sleep well knowing they would have no reason to come after someone like us. But the strangers in this film have no profile to adhere to, no motivation for their actions besides a sadistic nature.
Bertino had to know this would be the key to the movie’s ability to terrify, thus he never offers us a back story or motivation for these brutal actions. When Kristin begs for an explanation, the only answer she, along with the audience, gets is “because you were home.” Faceless strangers attacking whoever they happen to find. Nobody is safe.
The idea is mortifying, but what about the presentation? For a first-time director, Bertino’s creativity is impressive. The uneasy, often wobbly camera gives the impression the audience is often watching through the eyes of another person without the over-the-top shaky-cam effect that deterred so many from films like Cloverfield. Still, the cinematography never feels gimmicky, with steady, static shots often revealing more to us than the characters themselves are aware of, a sense of dread and glimpses of an impending horror with the inability to do anything but watch. And yet you want to watch. This film teases your nerves, keeps you on edge waiting, almost hoping, for something to happen just to break the unbearable tension.
But will it hold up on a second watch? With so much of the film’s spine-tingling moments based on anticipation, it’s unlikely the tension will remain once you know what is coming. Sure, the masks are creepy, many still shots will give you creeps forever, but they’re unlikely enough to make you jump on repeat viewings. Even first-time viewers will find a few aspects of the film unrealistic, such as a car being severely busted up without making any noise or modern albums just happening to be in vinyl for the sake of the scary record skips that made the trailer so damn creepy. Still, The Strangers leaves you will enough unanswered questions to let your imagination fill in the blanks with imagery to give you nightmares.
Excellent review, my friend. I wished I had liked it more.
Comment by Jerry — June 2, 2008 @ 8:25 pm
Awesome review! I’m very much looking forward to seeing this.
(Btw, they DO still make vinyl copies of new records nowadays. They sell ’em at Hot Topic!)
Comment by NeverWanderer — June 3, 2008 @ 9:29 pm
Good review, although I don’t necessarily agree with it. There honestly just wasn’t anything groundbreaking here to merit a good review. It was a very predictable movie (dead silence, followed by either a) loud noise or music or b) quick glimpse of stalkers up close), and the discontinuities were a little hard to overlook. The best thing the film had going for it was, as you said, this could potentially happen to anyone, because no motive or backstory are given. Concept aside, as a film, this is your standard horror fare, rinsed and repeated.
Also, is it just me or did they relay wayyy too much on the whole “we’re gonna have our main character in the foreground with the killers randomly creeping out in the background only to fade back into the darkness” shots?
Comment by Alex — June 6, 2008 @ 1:44 pm
@ Neverwanderer
That’s true, I know you can still get new albums on vinyl, I just found it too unrealistic that the characters just happen to have them in this film.
@ Alex
True, i think it was the concept and cinematography that made this one scary for me, even if it has been done before. The randomness of the crime and the way it was pulled off makes every noise you hear at night creepy. It definitely has its flaws, but for a first time director’s work I found it to be a surprisingly decent movie.
Comment by WordSlinger — June 21, 2008 @ 10:14 pm
If I can just quote a similar film with similar plot and idea, remember scream with the guy who played shaggy on scooby doo sorry im just drawing a blank there but, “It’s always scarier when there is no motive. and when there’s no identification makes you really think about who people might be for all anyone knows these people in this movie know each other, just like in scream. though i have spent most of my time comparing movies i was a lot younger when i saw scream and i could still sleep at night after the strangers it got a little harder
Comment by Eathen — June 6, 2009 @ 5:06 pm