| DC Relaunch: Six Comics Canceled and Replaced With ‘Second Wave’ |
|
DC Comics announced on Thursday that they would be setting up the second wave of “New 52” releases while also canceling six ongoing comics that were released in the initial run of the DC Relaunch. Resting in peace are six comics that were quite good and enjoyable or had a lot of potential to be great, so they will definitely be missed. Those comic books are Blackhawks – a war comic focusing on a group of militaristic mercenaries in the vein of G.I. Joe; Hawk and Dove – the only DC book written by the extremely talented Sterling Gates with art from Rob Liefeld (more on him in another article); Men of War – a war book that was one of my favorite comics of the relaunch that took a realistic approach to the military in a world full of superheroes; Mister Terrific – one of the very few DC comics with a person of color as the leading role. Also, the main character was highly intelligent and, interestingly enough in a comic, atheist. O.M.A.C. – this to me is a tragedy considering that it was a fan favorite even in the light of poor sales. Sure it’s bizarre and nutso, but it was a complete blast to read. And finally Static Shock – one of, if not the only book that could be considered “youthful” and “fun,” and also one of the few books starring a person of color. All of these titles will see their last issues in April.
...continue reading » Tags: Ariel Olivetti, Batman, Batman Incorporated, Blackhawks, China Miéville, Chris Burnham, DC Comics, DC Relaunch, Dial H, Dial H For Hero, Earth 2, G.I. Combat, George Perez, Grant Morrison, Hawk and Dove, J.T. Krul, James Robinson, Jimmy Palmiotti, Justin Gray, Kevin Maguire, Mateus Santolouco, Men of War, Mister Terrific, Nicola Scott, O.M.A.C., Paul Levitz, Static Shock, The Ravagers, Worlds' Finest | |
| | |
|
| Digital Comics Deal: ‘Superman/Batman’ For 99 Cents EachDC Comics and comiXology are offering a super sale this weekend with the Superman/Batman half-off digital comics deal. Out of all of the digital comics deals I’ve seen, this might just be the most impressive. And why is that? Well, every single issue of the 87-issue run is on sale for a mere 99 cents. Yes, that’s right. Every. Single. Issue.
...continue reading » Tags: Ace The Bathound, Batman, Brian Azzarello, Chris Roberson, ChrisCross, Comixology, Cullen Bunn, David Finch, DC Comics, Duncan Rouleau, Ed McGuinness, Jeph Loeb, Joe Kelly, Joshua Hale Fialkov, Krypto, Lee Bermejo, Michael Turner, Paul Levitz, Scott Kolins, Superman, Superman/Batman | |
| | |
|
| DC Comics Restructured As DC Entertainment; Paul Levitz Steps Down |
|
Last week brought us big news in the comics world when Marvel Comics was bought by Disney [Read: Disney To Acquire Marvel Entertainment], and today has brought us big news from the other member of the Big 2 as Warner Bros Entertainment announced that they are restructuring and renaming the DC Comic brand as DC Entertainment. Along with the restructuring comes word that long-time DC President and Publisher Paul Levitz will step down and take on more of a consulting job, as well as returning to writing. The announcement describes the newly formed DC Entertainment Inc as “a new company founded to fully realize the power and value of the DC Comics brand.” The rest of the press release tends to go on in a lot of corporate double speak, but what it means is that Warner Brothers and DC have seen what Marvel has done with its studio and realized that they desperately need to catch up. What does this mean for comics fans? Probably very little. There will be a new name on the indicia as Diane Nelson steps in to replace Levitz. Nelson has worked for Warner Brothers for 20 years, and she has recently overseen the franchise management of the Harry Potter property, and I’d say that has turned out pretty well for the creator, studio, and the fans, so that’s a good sign. The odds are that the restructuring will be more about producing more films and TV shows, and that the publishing division will continue to do its own thing, same as it has done in the past.
...continue reading » | | |
|
|
| | |
|
|