The headline alone should acknowledge the absurdity that there is even a shred of evidence that proves such a thing, but film critic Armond White believes that A Thousand Words, Eddie Murphyâ€™s flop â€“ and I say that lightly â€“ is indeed better than Ben Affleck’s critically acclaimed Argo.
White is notorious for obliterating highly acclaimed films and praising colossal failures, so seeing him make such comparisons isnâ€™t a total shock. But if you don’t know who he is, well let’s just say that he thinks Resident Evil 5 director Paul W.S. Anderson is better The Master director Paul Thomas Anderson.
This is exactly the comparison he made about A Thousand Words being better than Argo, which was nominated for five Golden Globes (winning two of them) and seven Academy Awards:
Brian Robbins and Eddie Murphy dared the most personal Hollywood critique since Clifford Odetsâ€™ The Big Knife; Ben Affleck trivialized Hollywood accountability.
His reasoning is so short and vague that itâ€™s hard to take him seriously. But White doesnâ€™t just stop there. He goes on to say how Ghost Rider: Spirit of Vengeance and Taken 2 are better than Zero Dark Thirty. Another film nominated for a number of Golden Globes and Oscars. This is what he had to say about the films:
Neveldine-Taylor and Olivier Megaton revealed the post-9/11 zeitgeist in genre tropes, while Bigelow reduced the zeitgeist to an enigmatic comic strip, a â€œmission accomplishedâ€ delusion.
Again, itâ€™s very short, but his explanation and reasoning is more clear. There are other films he points which he thinks are better than the other, some of which you may agree with, but of the most part, White is just trolling. But give the guy credit, he actually believes that the absolute â€œworstâ€ are the best and better than the â€œbestâ€ which he thinks are the worst.